Phase selection for cardiac contrast assessment

ABSTRACT

In one embodiment, at least one visual characteristic from a selected image is used to automatically select an ultrasound image from a set of images from a plurality of heart cycles. In another embodiment, motion correction is performed on ultrasound images that are automatically selected from a plurality of ultrasound images associated with the same phase of the heart cycle. In yet another embodiment, ultrasound images are automatically selected from a set of images based on a time interval that is within a tolerance range from a reference phase of the heart cycle. In another embodiment, a stored user-preference of a phase of the heart cycle is used to automatically select an ultrasound image from a set of images. In yet another embodiment, a user-defined region of interest is placed on an ultrasound image associated with a selected phase of a heart cycle.

RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.60/490,324, filed Jul. 25, 2003, which is hereby incorporated byreference herein.

BACKGROUND

Contrast agents can be used in a medical ultrasound examination toenhance diagnosis. The rate of contrast agent enhancement of tissuerelates to the rate of blood flow to the tissue and can be used todiagnose a variety of disease states. While contrast agentquantification can be performed over an entire heart cycle, techniqueshave been discussed for performing quantification on specific parts ofthe heart cycle. For example, U.S. Patent Application Publication No.US2003/0114759A1 to Skyba et al. describes an ultrasonic imaging systemand method for displaying tissue perfusion and other parameters varyingwith time in which gated or ungated images are used to enable aparametric display to be keyed to specific phases of the heart cycle.Additionally, QLAB Software by Philips Medical Systems has beendescribed as containing custom tools to “auto trim” relative to an ECGtrigger for quantification of specific parts of a cardiac cycle.

SUMMARY

The present invention is defined by the following claims, and nothing inthis section should be taken as a limitation on those claims.

By way of introduction, the embodiments described below relate to phaseselection for cardiac contrast assessment. In one embodiment, at leastone visual characteristic from a selected image is used to automaticallyselect an ultrasound image from a set of images from a plurality ofheart cycles. In another embodiment, motion correction is performed onultrasound images that are automatically selected from a plurality ofultrasound images associated with the same phase of the heart cycle. Inyet another embodiment, ultrasound images are automatically selectedfrom a set of images based on a time interval that is within a tolerancerange from a reference phase of the heart cycle. In another embodiment,a stored user-preference of a phase of the heart cycle is used toautomatically select an ultrasound image from a set of images. In yetanother embodiment, a user-defined region of interest is placed on anultrasound image associated with a selected phase of a heart cycle.Other embodiments are provided, and each of the embodiments describedherein can be used alone or in combination with one another.

The embodiments will now be described with reference to the attacheddrawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a medical diagnostic ultrasound imagingsystem of an embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a schematic of ultrasound images showing the time course ofcontrast agent into a heart.

FIG. 3 shows time intensity curves of an embodiment.

FIG. 4 is a flow chart of a method of an embodiment.

FIG. 5 illustrates a plurality of sets of ultrasound images of anembodiment.

FIG. 6 is a timeline showing an ECG trace and times when image frames ofan embodiment were acquired.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENTLY PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Introduction

Turning to the drawings, FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a medicaldiagnostic ultrasound imaging system 100 that can be used with theembodiments described herein, which generally relate to diagnosticultrasonic imaging with contrast agents. As shown in FIG. 1, theultrasound system 5 comprises a transducer probe 10, a beamformer 15, aprocessor 20, a display device 25, an ECG device 30, and a userinterface 35, each of which is in communication with the other throughone or more named or unnamed components. Two components can be incommunication with each other through a wired or wireless connection.The term “processor” broadly refers to the appropriate hardware and/orsoftware components of the ultrasound system 5 that can be used toimplement the functionality described herein. The ultrasound system 5can comprise additional components, which are not shown in FIG. 1 forsimplicity.

During an ultrasound examination, a sonographer contacts the transducerprobe 10 with a patient, and the ultrasound system's processor 20 causesthe beamformer 15 to apply a voltage to the transducer 10 to cause it tovibrate and emit an ultrasonic beam into the portion of the patient'sbody in contact with the transducer 10. Ultrasonic energy reflected fromthe patient's body impinges on the transducer 10, and the resultingvoltages created by the transducer 10 are received by the beamformer 15.The processor 20 processes the sensed voltages to create an ultrasoundimage and displays the image on the display device 25. The ECG device 30captures ECG information (e.g., a heart cycle waveform) from thepatient. The ECG information can be displayed with an ultrasound imageduring image acquisition. Additionally, the ECG information can bestored with an ultrasound image on a storage device internal or externalto the ultrasound system 5 for later review.

The ultrasound system 5 can be used for contrast agent imaging toenhance diagnosis. Venous injection of contrast agent causes an increasein the ultrasound signal when the contrast agent washes into the tissuebeing imaged. In operation, a high-intensity ultrasound pulse istransmitted to destroy contrast agent in a tissue, and then thehigh-intensity ultrasound pulse is turned off and the tissue is imagedas new contrast-agent-filled blood perfuses into the tissue. The rate ofthe contrast agent enhancement (or “wash-in”) relates to the rate ofblood flow to the tissue and ultimately to tissue perfusion. Because ofthis, the time course of contrast enhancement can be assessed todiagnose a variety of disease states from coronary artery disease totumor neovasculature to liver metastases. As used herein, the phrase“assessment of the time course of contrast enhancement” refers to eitherqualitative or quantitative assessment of contrast ultrasound images.All of these techniques rely on comparisons between images acquired atdifferent times in order to see the variation caused by contrast agentenhancement. These techniques will now be discussed.

Qualitative assessment is the simplest method of determining the timecourse of contrast enhancement and relies on observing, by eye, thevisible changes in an ultrasound image caused by contrast agent.Qualitative assessment had been done successfully for coronary perfusionassessment (Cwajg et al., “Detection of Angiographically SignificantCoronary Artery Disease with Accelerated Intermittent Imaging andIntravenous Administration of Ultrasound Contrast Materials,” AmericanHeart J. 139: 675-683 (2000)) and characterization of liver diseases.Diagnoses can be made by simply observing the contrast enhancement in a“live” ultrasound image or by reviewing a stored image clip.

Quantitative assessment (or analysis) refers to time intensity curveanalysis, parametric imaging, displaying results of calculations, or anyother contrast enhancement assessment technique (now existing or laterdeveloped) other than pure qualitative analysis. Time intensity curve(TIC) analysis allows more precise assessment of the time course ofcontrast enhancement than can be made by eye alone. TIC's present thevariation of the average signal level or number of color pixels in anumber of regions of interest (ROI's) in graphical form to identifycontrast enhancement differences between the regions. The data is alsofit to functional curves, the parameters of which are used to makeabsolute determinations of flow characteristics (Wei et al., “Basis forDetection of Stenosis Using Venous Administration of Microbubbles DuringMyocardial Contrast Echocardiography: Bolus or Continuous Infusion,”JACC 32: 252-60 (July 1998)). These parameters can be related tocoronary flow reserve (Wei et al., “Noninvasive Quantification ofCoronary Blood Flow Reserve in Humans Using Myocardial ContrastEchocardiography,” Circulation 103: 2560-2565 (2001)) and can be used tomake diagnoses.

FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate the use of TICs. FIG. 2 is a schematic ofultrasound images showing the time course of contrast agent into aheart. The image at time 0 seconds was taken before the start ofcontrast agent wash-in, and the images at times 1 second, 2 seconds, and3 seconds were taken during contrast wash-in. As shown in these images,the signal from tissue grows over time, but enhancement is slower in thetop part of the image, indicating a problem in blood flow.Quantification is accomplished by placing two regions of interest 40, 50at different regions of the heart image. Changes in the pixel intensityin the two regions of interest 40, 50 is indicative of contrast wash-inin those regions 40, 50, and the average intensity from within thoseregions 40, 50 is plotted in time-intensity curves (see FIG. 3). Thetime-intensity curves show that the contrast enhancement in region ofinterest 50 is slower than the contrast enhancement in region ofinterest 40 by virtue of the reduced signal at times 1 second and 2seconds. The data points in the time intensity curves are fitted withsmooth functions 60, 70, and parameters of these functions are relatedto the blood flow in the tissue.

TIC analysis has had limited penetration into the market due to therelatively time-consuming analysis required and the lack of spatialinformation derived from a small number of ROI's. Removing this obstaclewhile maintaining much of its sensitivity is parametric imaging.Parametric imaging combines the spatial resolution and ease of use ofqualitative assessment with the sensitivity of quantitative curvefitting. In parametric imaging, the variation over time of signal levelfrom each pixel is fitted by some function that relates to aphysiological phenomenon. Selected parameters from the function for eachpixel can then be combined into an image to show variation in the entireseries in a static image. For contrast agent imaging, some parameter orcombination of parameters related to contrast wash-in is displayed inthis parametric image. In this way, spatial variation of the wash-intime course can be easily assessed.

Motion Effects on the Assessment of the Time Course of ContrastEnhancement

During a myocardial contrast imaging exam, cardiac ultrasound images areacquired at a high frame rate (typically, more than 15 frames persecond) in order to provide wall motion information for qualitative wallmotion assessment as well as to facilitate maintaining the scan plane.However, this high frame rate provides little additional information forquantification assessment, and cardiac motion shown by this high framerate can make quantification difficult. For example, cardiac motion cancause substantial changes in intensity from different regions. Thesecyclic changes are apparent in time intensity curves generated from eachframe in a real-time clip. It is also difficult or impossible tomaintain the same tissue in a ROI through the cardiac cycle. Thickeningcauses the tissue in a fixed area to change, and any rotation of theheart will also cause different tissue to be in the image plane atdifferent phases of the heart cycle.

One solution to this problem is to select one image from each heartcycle for analysis. (As described below, in some situations, more thanone image from each heart cycle can be selected.) The selection ofimages from the same phase of the heart cycle prevents contractilecardiac motion from interfering with quantification of myocardialperfusion because subsequent analysis (preferably including ROIplacement) is based on the set of images acquired at the selected phaseinstead of all of the acquired images. (As used herein, “set” refers toa group of one or more than one member.)

FIG. 4 is a flow chart of a method for phase selection for cardiaccontrast assessment of an embodiment. As shown in FIG. 4, a plurality ofsets of ultrasound images associated with a respective plurality ofheart cycles is provided (act 100). Next, a phase of the heart cycle isselected (act 110), and ultrasound images associated with the selectedphase are automatically selected (act 120). Next, qualitative and/orquantitative assessment is performed. With qualitative assessment, theautomatically-selected ultrasound images are displayed for userassessment (act 130). With quantification assessment involving timeintensity curves, one or more regions of interest are placed on anultrasound image associated with the selected phase (act 150), andquantification analysis is performed (act 160). As shown in FIG. 4, withparametric imaging, no regions of interest are necessary (sincequantification is done on each pixel).

Motion correction (act 140) can be used with either qualitative orquantitative assessment. It is important to note that while FIG. 4 showsa method with multiple acts, each of these acts can be used alone or incombination with one another. Additionally, these acts can be performedon an ultrasound system or an image review station (e.g., a dedicatedworkstation or a personal computer with a processor, display device, anduser interface). These acts will now be discussed.

Providing a Plurality of Sets of Ultrasound Images

The first act of the method is to provide a plurality of sets ofultrasound images associated with a respective plurality of heart cycles(act 100). These images can be stored, for example, in a storage devicein an ultrasound system or image review station, on removable media(e.g., a magneto-optical disc), or in a network location accessible bythe ultrasound system or image review station.

With some of the embodiments below, it is preferred that the storedimages be acquired using “real-time imaging.” As used herein, the term“real-time imaging” refers to acquiring ultrasound images with asufficiently high frame rate such that enough ultrasound images areacquired to allow the selection of an image associated with a desiredphase of the heart cycle. “Real-time images” refers to images acquiredduring “real-time imaging.” “Real-time imaging” is different from gatedimaging, in which a portion of the heart cycle, such as an R-wave,triggers the acquisition of a single ultrasound image per heart cycle.“Gated images” refer to images acquired using gated imaging. Withoutintending to set a lower limit to the definition of “real-time imaging,”an example of real-time imaging is acquiring ultrasound images at aframe rate of more than 15 frames per second. It should be noted that,as used herein, the term “real time” does not indicate when images aredisplayed with respect to a time of acquisition. Accordingly, imagesplayed from a stored clip can be “real time” images even though they arebeing displayed at a time after acquisition.

Selecting a Phase of the Heart Cycle

Next, a phase of the heart cycle is selected (act 110). This act can beperformed manually or automatically. FIG. 5 will be used to illustratethe manual operation. FIG. 5 shows a display of four sets 200, 210, 220,230 of ultrasound images of an apical four-chamber view of the heartover four heart cycles. Each of the displayed images is associated witha particular phase of the heart cycle, and selection one of thedisplayed images selects a phase in the heart cycle. In operation, auser selects a displayed image to represent the cardiac phase that he isinterested in based on the shape of the heart in the image or the stateof the ECG signal associated with that image. For example, selection ofimage A selects a portion of the heart cycle that is X ms after thepreceding R-wave.

In the automatic operation, a user can set a phase preference (e.g., Xms after the R-wave) that is stored in a storage device of theultrasound system. In future examinations, the ultrasound systemretrieves the stored user-preference to automatically select the phaserather than requiring the user to select a displayed image or take someother action to manually select the desired phase. A combination of theautomatic and manual operations can be used. For example, the automaticoperation can be used to initially select the phase, and, if the user isdissatisfied with this selection, the manual operation can be used.

Automatically Selecting Ultrasound Images Associated with the SelectedPhase

For each of the plurality of sets of ultrasound images, an imageassociated with the selected phase of the heart cycle is automaticallyselected (act 120). This selection can be performed, for example, basedon a time interval from a part of the heart cycle, such as the R-wave,or from image information. Each of these techniques will now bedescribed.

Cardiac ultrasound machines provide a subsystem that measuresphysiological signals (such as the ECG signal) and present theinformation along with the ultrasound images as a reference, as shown inFIG. 5. The ultrasound system typically detects when the R-wave occursin each heartbeat. The times for each R-wave can be stored along withthe times of acquisition of each of the contrast images. The differencebetween the timestamp for each image and the time of the previous R-waveproduces an interval that is analogous to the cardiac phase. Cardiacphase can be defined in a number of ways. The simplest method is todefine only two phases of the heart—systole and diastole. This issimilar to dividing a sinusoid into a negative phase and a positivephase. Sinusoidal phase can be more specifically defined using a phaseangle, and, in a similar fashion, the phase of the cardiac cycle can bedivided more finely. Although the phase angle does not fit for thecardiac cycle as it does for sinusoids, the phase can be defined aschanging continuously during a cycle where the heart is in the samestate during the same phase in all cycles. Irregularities can beconsidered as variations in the rate of phase change during a heartbeator between heartbeats.

In operation, the time interval between a reference phase (e.g., apreceding R-wave) and the selected phase is determined. That timeinterval is then compared with the time interval between the referencephase and the phase associated with each image in a set of images from aheart cycle. An image in each cardiac cycle can be selected that has aninterval from the preceding R-wave that most closely matches theinterval for the image associated with the selected phased. Withreference to FIG. 6, a timeline 300 shows an ECG trace and the timeswhen image frames were acquired. Each rectangle indicates the time forone ultrasound frame. When a user selects image A, the ultrasound systemautomatically identifies frames B, C, D, E, F, and G as having a similarphase as A based on the ECG signal characteristics, such as the timeinterval from the preceding R-wave or some other characteristic of theECG signal. In this way, the ECG information is used to sample an imageclip at a rate of one frame per heartbeat at the selected phase toretain only images A-G for subsequent analysis.

If the imaging frame rate is irregular (possibly due to contrastdestruction), there may not be an image that was acquired with a similarinterval. In this case, the system preferably identifies that the matchis poor and does not provide any images for some of the cardiac cycles.For example, a poor match can be defined as when the best match differsby more than 100 ms. Further, the above method relies on each cardiaccycle being identical. When there are irregularities, the intervalbetween an image and the preceding R-wave may not give a good indicationof the phase of the heart in that image. The interval to the succeedingR-wave can also be used to identify the cardiac phase in an image inquestion, although it should be acknowledged that the length of diastolevaries to a much greater extent than does the length of systole. Othercharacteristics of the ECG signal can also be used to get a betterestimate of the phase of a particular image. For example, the T-wave canbe identified in order to better identify end-systole. This time can beused as another reference when determining the phase of a particularframe.

Instead of using ECG information, an image can be automatically selectedbased on one or more visual characteristics of an image, such as theshape of the heart and/or the state of the valves. In this way, visualcharacteristics are used to identify a phase in the heart cycle. Inoperation, an image from a set of images associated with a heart cycleis selected. This image can be manually selected by a user orautomatically selected by identifying which image from the set isassociated with a phase in a stored user-preference. Then, at least onevisual characteristic from the selected image is compared to at leastone visual characteristic of the ultrasound images from the other sets.The images that most-closely match (or match using some other criteria)would be automatically selected. With reference again to theillustration in FIG. 5, if the user selects image A, the ultrasoundsystem would compare image characteristics such as position of the valveleaflets and/or the shape of the myocardium in image A withcorresponding visual characteristics in other images in the clip toselect the images that match most closely. In this example, A closelymatches images B, C, and D, so images A, B, C, and D are used forsubsequent analysis. (Alternatively, only the automatically-selectedimages (images B, C, and D) can be used for subsequent analysis and/ordisplay.)

In the above discussion, only one frame per cardiac cycle was selectedfor analysis. In some cases, however, the heart does not changesignificantly over portions of the heart cycle. For example, indiastole, there are periods where the heart is comparatively still.Several neighboring images from these quiet periods can be used inquantification (to provide more data points) without the complication ofheart motion. To do this based on the time interval from the previousR-wave, the system would identify all the images that had intervalswithin some tolerance range of the interval for the user-selected image.Because the speed of the heart changes dramatically during the heartcycle, this tolerance range preferably varies based on the interval(e.g., longer for intervals within diastole and shorter for intervalswithin systole).

Qualitative Assessment

During qualitative assessment, the ultrasound images associated with thedesired phase are displayed (act 130). By visually observing the images,the user can detect visible changes caused by contrast agent to make adiagnosis.

Quantitative Assessment

As described above, quantitative assessment (or analysis) refers to timeintensity curve analysis, parametric imaging, displaying results ofcalculations, or any other contrast enhancement assessment technique(now existing or later developed) other than pure qualitative analysis.Quantitative assessment often relies on the placement of at least oneregion of interest. Although the region(s) of interest can be placed onan image before or after the automatic selection of images describedabove, placing the ROI(s) on an automatically-selected image allows auser to rapidly scroll through an image clip to check ROI placement inall the relevant images because the data set has been reduced to imagesat a particular cardiac phase. After the ROI(s) have been placed,quantification can be performed. For example, time intensity curves canbe drawn for each phase of interest in the cardiac cycle. In onepresently preferred embodiment, at least one region of interest used inquantification is user-defined and comprises more than nine pixels butcovers less than the entire imaged tissue (e.g., the entire myocardium).As used herein, the term “pixel” refers to any one of the small discretebasic elements from which an image is composed.

Motion Correction

By selecting images from the same phase of the cardiac cycle,contractile cardiac motion is removed before further analysis.Contractile motion makes up a large part of the motion of the heart, butpatient breathing and inadvertent probe movement can also cause motionof the heart in an ultrasound image. Preferably, this motion is alsotracked in order to effectively quantify changes in the ultrasoundsignal received from the tissue. Many techniques have been developed toautomatically determine the motion between pairs of images. While thesetechniques have been used, motion correction in a real-time image clipcan be very difficult because of contractile cardiac motion. The phaseselection techniques described above simplify motion correction becausethey allow motion tracking to be performed on a reduced set of images.By first identifying the phase to align, motion correction processingtime can be reduced by a factor of 10-30 due to the reduction in thenumber of frames processed.

The motion between pairs of images can be used to change the location ofthe ROI's so that each ROI always encompasses the same tissue.Alternatively, after the motion has been determined, the images can beregistered together so that the motion between the images is removed.Simple registration can allow the entire image to move as a unit toremove bulk motion. More complicated techniques register different partsof the image independently and stretch or shrink the intervening imagein order to accommodate relative movement in an image.

The most successful motion detection techniques use correlation-basedalgorithms such as minimizing the sum of absolute differences (SAD). TheSAD technique is a good choice because it is well-suited for rapidcalculation. Using this technique, the absolute difference is calculatedbetween each point in the original image and points in the subsequentimage corresponding to each of many potential motions. The best estimateof the actual motion is chosen as the movement of the second image thatproduces the minimum of the sum of the absolute differences. When ROI'sare tracked to eliminate motion, the SAD is preferably calculatedbetween each ROI in the original image and possible motions of that ROIin the subsequent image. The minimum of the SAD for each ROI willprovide an estimate of the position of each ROI in the subsequent image.When simple, bulk-movement registration is used, the SAD is preferablycalculated for a large region in the center of the image. This willestimate the motion of the most important part of the image in order toeliminate that motion through registration. When more complicatedregistration techniques are used that accommodate relative movement inthe image, the SAD is preferably calculated for many regions throughoutthe image. The movement of each of these regions can then be estimatedbased on the minimum of these SAD calculations and error checking. Inthis technique, more weight is preferably placed on the displacementestimates from some regions when calculating the displacement field forthe image.

There are several alternatives that can be used with these embodiments.For example, while the embodiments described above have been illustratedusing contrast-enhanced ultrasound images, these techniques can also beused with ultrasound images that are free of contrast agent. Further, asnoted above, these embodiments can be used with real-time or gatedimages. For example, motion correction can be performed on gated imagesor images manually selected by a user from a real-time image clipinstead of automatically-selected images. Further, motion correction cantake place before or after region of interest placement and can be usedin conjunction with either qualitative or quantitative assessment.Finally, as noted above, each of the embodiments described herein can beused alone or in combination with one another.

It is intended that the foregoing detailed description be understood asan illustration of selected forms that the invention can take and not asa definition of the invention. It is only the following claims,including all equivalents, that are intended to define the scope of thisinvention.

1-57. (canceled)
 58. A method for automatically selecting ultrasoundimages associated with a phase of a heart cycle, the method comprising:(a) providing a plurality of sets of ultrasound images associated with arespective plurality of heart cycles; (b) retrieving a storeduser-preference of a phase of the heart cycle; and (c) for each of theplurality of sets of ultrasound images, automatically selecting anultrasound image that is associated with the phase specified in thestored user-preference.
 59. The invention of claim 58 furthercomprising; (d) performing motion correction on theautomatically-selected ultrasound images.
 60. The invention of claim 58further comprising; (d) displaying the automatically-selected ultrasoundimages.
 61. The invention of claim 58 further comprising; (d) performinga quantification analysis on the automatically-selected ultrasoundimages.
 62. The invention of claim 58 further comprising; (d) generatinga set of time intensity curves using the automatically-selectedultrasound images.
 63. The invention of claim 58, wherein the ultrasoundimages are automatically selected in (c) by comparing at least onevisual characteristic of an ultrasound image associated with the phasespecified in the stored user preference with at least one visualcharacteristic of the ultrasound images in each of the plurality ofsets.
 64. The invention of claim 58, wherein the ultrasound images areautomatically selected in (c) by comparing (1) a time interval between areference phase in the heart cycle and a phase associated with anultrasound images in a set with (2) a time interval between thereference phase and the phase specified in the stored user preference.65. The invention of claim 58, wherein the ultrasound images comprisereal-time images.
 66. The invention of claim 58, wherein the ultrasoundimages comprise contrast-enhanced ultrasound images.
 67. The inventionof claim 58 further comprising placing at least one region of intereston an automatically-selected image.
 68. A method for automaticallyselecting ultrasound images associated with a phase of a heart cycle,the method comprising: (a) providing a plurality of sets of ultrasoundimages associated with a respective plurality of heart cycles; (b)selecting a phase of a heart cycle; (c) for each of the plurality ofsets, automatically selecting an ultrasound image that is associatedwith the selected phase of the heart cycle; and (d) placing at least oneuser-defined region of interest on an ultrasound image associated withthe selected phase of the heart cycle.
 69. The invention of claim 68,wherein the at least one user-defined region of interest comprises morethan nine pixels.
 70. The invention of claim 68, wherein the at leastone user-defined region of interest comprises less than an entire imagedtissue.
 71. The invention of claim 68, wherein the at least oneuser-defined region of interest comprises less than an entiremyocardium.
 72. The invention of claim 68 further comprising performingmotion correction on the automatically-selected ultrasound images. 73.The invention of claim 72, wherein the motion correction is performedbefore (d).
 74. The invention of claim 72, wherein the motion correctionis performed after (d).
 75. The invention of claim 68, wherein the phaseof the heart cycle is selected in (b) by a stored user-preference. 76.The invention of claim 68, wherein the phase of the heart cycle isselected in (b) by user selection of one of a plurality of displayedultrasound images, each of the displayed ultrasound images beingassociated with a respective phase of the heart cycle.
 77. The inventionof claim 76, wherein the user-selected image comprises at least onevisual characteristic, and wherein the ultrasound images areautomatically selected in (c) by comparing the at least one visualcharacteristic of the user-selected image with at least one visualcharacteristic of the ultrasound images in each of the plurality ofsets.
 78. The invention of claim 68, wherein the ultrasound images areautomatically selected in (c) by comparing (1) a time interval between areference phase in the heart cycle and a phase associated with anultrasound images in a set with (2) a time interval between thereference phase and the selected phase.
 79. The invention of claim 78,wherein the reference phase comprises a preceding R-wave.
 80. Theinvention of claim 78, wherein the reference phase comprises asucceeding R-wave.
 81. The invention of claim 78, wherein the referencephase comprises a T-wave.
 82. The invention of claim 68, wherein theultrasound images comprise real-time images.
 83. The invention of claim68, wherein the ultrasound images comprise contrast-enhanced ultrasoundimages.
 84. The invention of claim 68 further comprising displaying theautomatically-selected ultrasound images.
 85. The invention of claim 68further comprising: (e) performing a quantification analysis on theautomatically-selected ultrasound images.
 86. The invention of claim 68further comprising: (e) generating a time-intensity curve for the atlease one region of interest.
 87. (canceled)
 88. (canceled)